<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Kansas NAPUS &#187; employee relations</title>
	<atom:link href="http://kansasnapus.org/blog/archives/category/employee-relations/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://kansasnapus.org/blog</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 06 Sep 2010 13:00:27 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Pay for Performance</title>
		<link>http://blog.uspsoig.gov/?p=4057</link>
		<comments>http://blog.uspsoig.gov/?p=4057#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Sep 2010 13:00:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>RARC Host da</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Labor]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PFP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pay for Performance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[USPS OIG]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[employee relations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[employees]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[performance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[postal service]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[review]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[reward system]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.uspsoig.gov/?p=4057</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[What’s the best way to encourage good performance? Employers have always struggled with this question. One answer is to pay employees based on how well they perform their jobs. Many private sector employers have adopted pay-for-performance (PFP) prog...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[What’s the best way to encourage good performance? Employers have always struggled with this question. One answer is to pay employees based on how well they perform their jobs. Many private sector employers have adopted pay-for-performance (PFP) programs, and several federal agencies have also experimented with PFP. Some federal PFP programs have operated successfully for [...]]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.uspsoig.gov/?feed=rss2&amp;p=4057</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Safety First!</title>
		<link>http://blog.uspsoig.gov/?p=3894</link>
		<comments>http://blog.uspsoig.gov/?p=3894#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Aug 2010 13:00:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Eng and Fac Team wa</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Facilities]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Labor]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[OSHA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[P&DCs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[USPS OIG]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[electrical]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[employee relations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hazards]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[postal service]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[safety]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[violations]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.uspsoig.gov/?p=3894</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[5,214 workers died on the job in the U.S. in 2008 "With every one of these fatalities, the lives of a worker's family members were shattered and forever changed. We can't forget that fact." -Hilda Solis, Secretary of Labor Safety is a key component of ...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[5,214 workers died on the job in the U.S. in 2008 "With every one of these fatalities, the lives of a worker's family members were shattered and forever changed. We can't forget that fact." -Hilda Solis, Secretary of Labor Safety is a key component of all Postal Service operations, activities, and facilities. Nonetheless, safety issues [...]]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.uspsoig.gov/?feed=rss2&amp;p=3894</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Postal Strike of 1970</title>
		<link>http://blog.uspsoig.gov/?p=3092</link>
		<comments>http://blog.uspsoig.gov/?p=3092#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Mar 2010 12:08:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>RARC host</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Delivery]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Labor]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Retail]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[USPS OIG]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Unions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[employee relations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[postal service]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[postal strike]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.uspsoig.gov/?p=3092</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.uspsoig.gov/?feed=rss2&amp;p=3092</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Will Postal Service bosses go undercover in the future?</title>
		<link>http://blog.uspsoig.gov/?p=3058</link>
		<comments>http://blog.uspsoig.gov/?p=3058#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Mar 2010 14:00:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>RARC host</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Labor]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[USPS OIG]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[brainstorming]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[employee relations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[feedback]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[management]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[officers]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.uspsoig.gov/?p=3058</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[“Undercover Boss,” a CBS show that began airing in February, follows Chief Executive Officers (CEOs) as they go undercover to work primarily in lower-level positions in their own companies. Beyond its entertainment value, the episodes have exposed ...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[“Undercover Boss,” a CBS show that began airing in February, follows Chief Executive Officers (CEOs) as they go undercover to work primarily in lower-level positions in their own companies. Beyond its entertainment value, the episodes have exposed a significant disconnect between senior management and employees. While featured CEO’s have not recently, if ever, worked in [...]]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.uspsoig.gov/?feed=rss2&amp;p=3058</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>To Award or Not to Award:  What’s the Postal Service to Do?</title>
		<link>http://blog.uspsoig.gov/?p=2038</link>
		<comments>http://blog.uspsoig.gov/?p=2038#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Jul 2009 13:08:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Suspicious Expenditures host</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Labor]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[USPS OIG]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[competitive market]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[employee relations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[incentives]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[postal service]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[recruitment]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.uspsoig.gov/?p=2038</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Should the Postal Service be allowed to freely award employees for a job well done? The Postal Service operates as a businesslike entity, but it is also part of the government. Appearances count — particularly in tough economic times. The Postal Serv...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[Should the Postal Service be allowed to freely award employees for a job well done? The Postal Service operates as a businesslike entity, but it is also part of the government. Appearances count — particularly in tough economic times. The Postal Service has an interest in recruiting and retaining talented employees to remain competitive, but [...]]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.uspsoig.gov/?feed=rss2&amp;p=2038</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
