<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Kansas NAPUS &#187; Processing</title>
	<atom:link href="http://kansasnapus.org/blog/archives/category/processing/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://kansasnapus.org/blog</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 26 Jul 2010 13:00:09 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Should the Postal Service Eliminate Sunday Mail Processing Operations?</title>
		<link>http://blog.uspsoig.gov/?p=2243</link>
		<comments>http://blog.uspsoig.gov/?p=2243#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Sep 2009 13:00:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Network Ops host</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Processing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sunday operations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[USPS OIG]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.uspsoig.gov/?p=2243</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Keep Sunday Operations?
We’ve all heard the bad news.  Mail volume in fiscal year (FY) 2008 totaled 202.7 billion pieces, a decline of 9.5 billion pieces or 4.5 percent compared to the previous fiscal year.  Mail volume has declined even further this...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[Keep Sunday Operations?
We’ve all heard the bad news.  Mail volume in fiscal year (FY) 2008 totaled 202.7 billion pieces, a decline of 9.5 billion pieces or 4.5 percent compared to the previous fiscal year.  Mail volume has declined even further this year.  At the end of the last quarter, mail volume was [...]]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.uspsoig.gov/?feed=rss2&amp;p=2243</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Mail Volume: What Goes Up…?</title>
		<link>http://blog.uspsoig.gov/?p=411</link>
		<comments>http://blog.uspsoig.gov/?p=411#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Dec 2008 11:24:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Blog Editor</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Cost, Revenue, and Rates]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Processing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[USPS OIG]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[first class]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[standard]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[volume]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.uspsoig.gov/?p=411</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In 1970, the Postal Service delivered fewer than 85 billion pieces of mail. Thirty years later, mail volume had more than doubled to nearly 208 billion pieces of mail — average growth of about 3 percent per year. The Postal Service relied upon this d...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[In 1970, the Postal Service delivered fewer than 85 billion pieces of mail. Thirty years later, mail volume had more than doubled to nearly 208 billion pieces of mail — average growth of about 3 percent per year. The Postal Service relied upon this dependable growth in mail volume to finance the expansion of its [...]]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.uspsoig.gov/?feed=rss2&amp;p=411</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
